I didn't think much of the 220 band, is it active in your area?  It sure 
isn't here, though we have some stuff on 220.  When I got the radio I didn't 
know what I was in for in terms of coverage and the fact that it had a whole 
other receiver!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Russ Kiehne" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: e-skip


>I wanted the f6a because of the 220 band.  There are several 220 repeaters
> in the San Francisco bay area.  I really like the radio after having it a
> few weeks.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:48 PM
> Subject: Re: e-skip
>
>
>> the f6A hears alright with a good HF antenna on those bands. I mainly use
>> it
>> for a 2 meter/440 radio and a scanner. No 220 activity here I can get in
>> to.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:37 PM
>> Subject: Re: e-skip
>>
>>
>>> It seems like everything else on teh F6 is normal or average.  I've even
>>> found a way to get HF to work well there with the right antenna.  It's 
>>> no
>>> table top or world band receiver though, but something out and about it
>>> works well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Butch Bussen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ype, tv on the f 6 sucks big time.  Main reason I bought the Icom t-90.
>>>> Stuff you can't even hear on the f6 is full quieting on the t-90. 
>>>> Still
>>>> my favorite radio though, the f6 that is.
>>>> 73s
>>>> Butch Bussen
>>>> wa0vjr
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>