BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:50:39 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
I don't own a ts480, but i have noticed that the TS-2000 exhibits much the
same thing as you mentioned with signals sounding about 2 S units louder
then what the meter is indicating.
The ts570 seems to have a very accurate meter and will only give an S0 if
the station truely is an S0.
I find many of my DX contacts are S0 according to the TS2000, and when i
compare signal reports with another ham very close to me using a similar
antenna and a ts570, he usually shows around S2 to s4 on those same
stations.

My opinion on this one is that kenwood has decided to calibrate their newer
radios a little lean for some reason.
I think the standard is to calibrate for 100MV as an S9 signal
strength...but they may be calibrating a little bit higher on that one.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:58 AM
Subject: rst


> I wonder if anybody else is finding that the signal reports on the
> ts480 sound very scotch?  Maybe about two s units down from what your
> ear tells you?
> The other thing is that if you switch from ssb to cw, the reported
> strength drops by two s units.  Your ear tells a different
> story.  I'd like to know if that is what other ts480 users find.
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.1/369 - Release Date: 6/19/2006
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2