Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 5 May 2006 19:35:26 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think it's nothing more than a server software default.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: List Policy was: coax question
They had that idiocy on the old list serve too, doesn't make sense to me =
but oh well. I don't run the list. Usually if I get that warning that I =
went over I don't even bother shortening my messages anymore.=20
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Ham Steve=20
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: List Policy was: coax question
Ken,
I wonder what the logic is now of limiting posts to the list to 250 =
lines.=20
If there were no limitation, then I could post the article on =
soldering=20
coaxial cable directly to the list. But, as it is, it exceeds the =
limit by=20
100 lines.
The message from the listserv indicates that these limits are up to=20
individual listowners and not a functional limitation of the server.
Take my advice, I don't use it anyway
Steve
Lansing, Mi
|
|
|