BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:01:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
I have mid speed SBC/AT&t DSL for $25 a month.  Very stable; I have 
one filter where the DSL line comes to the house and the phones are 
silent (except for the words being said!!).
Pat, K9JAU At 03:42 PM 4/25/2006, you wrote:
>DSL is a little slower but if you don't do a lot of downloading you =
>shouldn't notice much. Find out what speed the DSL is though, some times =
>in the real good deals they can drop the speeds to about dialup speeds, =
>they did that to a friend of mine. Not sure what company but they made =
>him pay quite a bit more if he wanted good speed.
>   ----- Original Message -----=20
>   From: Phil Scovell=20
>   To: [log in to unmask]
>   Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 4:29 PM
>   Subject: DSL Question
>
>
>   First, let me say from the out set, that I know this has nothing to do =
>with
>   ham radio.  However, since everybody on this list is a ham and is =
>literally
>   on the internet, does anybody have an opinion about DSL verses cable?  =
>Qwest
>   here in Denver is offering a digital phone connection, direct TV, =
>their best
>   DSL, and several other things in a package deal that will save me 100
>   dollars over all I am paying for right now.  I'm just wondering if =
>I'll
>   notice much difference going from cable to DSL?
>
>   Phil.
>   K0NX

ATOM RSS1 RSS2