Hi Colin & Everyone;
I use the Panasonic 5240M.
That is the model number of the base unit.
The handsets are the 520m and I have one with a clock radio and the model
number is the 523m.
The work great!
Their is no difference between the handset that comes with the clock radio
and any other extendable handset that they sell for this 5.8gig unit.
However, the clock radio has a charging stand for the phone.
Also, the clock radio has 5 preset buttons and they can be use for both am.
and fm. stations.
The only thing that talks on the phone is the talking caller id.
73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] new 5.8 GHz phone getting mixed reviews
> Jeff:
> From what i know of cordless phones, and thats limited, technically
> speaking
> anyway, they usually set the power at the highest legal limit for those
> devices on both the hand set and the bass unit.
> Remember, the highest legal limit, is probably around 0.03 milliwatts or
> something....so that sort of power coming out of the bass, and hopefully
> the
> same coming out of the handset can be suseptible to all kinds of things.,
> Also, i know for a fact that the cheaper you go with chordless phones, the
> lesser quality you will get....much like most other consumer items...there
> is usually a pretty good reason why things cost more.
> If you spend 50 bucks on a cordless phone, you will not get the same
> quality, in most cases, as if you spent $250 on a cordless phone...that is
> just the way it works i guess.
> For instance, my panasonic 2.4G bear bones phone had about a 4 block range
> in any direction from inside the top level of the house...probably about
> 15
> feet above ground.the phone originally cost a little over $200.
> My parents recently bought a 2.4g phone for 19 bucks at wall mart with
> lots
> of bells and whistles, but that phone will not talk more then 30 feet in
> any
> direction, and sometimes that is uncertain. It also happens to be a
> panasonic.
> So, bassed on that relatively anecdotal comparison, i would think the more
> you spend on a 2way radio device, the better quality its going to be.
> This holds true with most radio devices.
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:17 PM
> Subject: Re: new 5.8 GHz phone getting mixed reviews
>
>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> I've never heard of an option like that on any cordless phone,
>> although I believe that some of them will increase power on their own
>> if the reception degrades. You may also find that some brands have
>> better range than others, and sometimes different models of a
>> particular brand are better than others. Unfortunately, the models
>> change so quickly that even if you know which ones were good six
>> months ago, it won't help you today. I had very good luck with one
>> model of GE, but when I bought a different model, I couldn't even get
>> 20 foot coverage. It might help if you tell the sales person that
>> you need a phone with lots of range, but then again, you may still
>> not know until you get it home and try it. You may find that you
>> have to spend more to get the coverage you need.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> On Tuesday 4/4/06 19:13 Jeff Kenyon wrote:
>> >Hi Everyone, I've had this Uniden Phone for a day now, and have mixed
>> >opinions about it. The reason I went with 5.8 GHz is because of what I
> have
>> >read on here and other places with regard to range. This afternoon I
> took a
>> >walk around the block and didn't notice any real big difference verses
>> >my
>> >900 MHz phone and I don't know if it is because the walls in my house
>> >are
>> >really thick or what. Tomorrow I am planning on trying to test it again
>> >with putting the transmitter in the window to see what happens. When I
>> >shoed the phone to my mother we got a call at dinner, and it was in my
>> >pocket while I was down stairs, and the audio quality wasn't that great,
> and
>> >again I think that it is because of the thickness of our walls. I just
> had
>> >my step brother take a quick look in the manual to see if there is any
> way
>> >of increasing the power, but there doesn't appear to be anything in the
>> >manual, but what I am wondering on other 5.8 GHz phones are there
> settings
>> >for increasing power from the transmitter?
>>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.5/301 - Release Date: 4/4/2006
>
|
