They make oen with a talking caller ID but that's not the one I have here.

At 02:35 PM 04/03/2006, you wrote:
>Hi
>
>     Pardon me if I repeat some thing that has already been said I haven't
>read every post on this subject.  Isn't the Panasonic the phone that has the
>talking caller ID?
>God loves you!
>My personal prayer book.
>Add your prayer or pray for others at the following link.
>http://prayerbook.homewithgod.com/cgi-bin/prayerbook/multi.pl?131961113534708:24:0
>
>http://lists.topica.com/lists/funhamradio.
>http://groups.google.com/group/funhamradio-list
>
>http://funhamradio.bloki.com
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 10:58 AM
>Subject: Re: off topic cordlss phone question
>
>
> > Hi Jeff;
> >
> > Let us know what you purchased.
> >
> > I would personally go with any Panasonic 5.8gig phone.
> >
> > 73 De Anthony W2AJV
> > [log in to unmask]
> > ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:12 AM
> > Subject: [BLIND-HAMS] off topic cordlss phone question
> >
> >
> >> Good morning everyone.  I am planning on going out later on today, and
> >> getting a new cordless phone.  The one that I have has just about had it.
> >> I am leaning towards getting one that is either 2.4 or 5.8 GHz, and I am
> >> just wondering what works best in terms of range, and other features, and
> >> what will not interfere with any wireless LANs?  Any suggestions would be
> >> great, and thanks in advance.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.4/299 - Release Date: 3/31/2006
> >>
> >>
> >