BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Amanda J. Rush" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 1 Apr 2006 21:11:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
I don't think they should get rid of the requirement.
Otherwise, what's the insentive to work harder to get the general or extra
class licenses?


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Jeff Kenyon
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 9:06 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: FCC Morse code announcement


Well, that is really good.   I still hear a lot of CW out there.  I think
that there was actually a time where you had to have 20 words as a
requirement.  What do the rest of you think of the FCC doing away with a
 code requirement?  I think that if they do that, they should have more
technical questions added to the theory.





On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Phil Scovell wrote:

> Jeff,
>
> I think it was still 5 13 and 20 if I remember correctly.  It has been so
> long ago I took the 20 Word per minute test, I can't recall for certain.
I
> still call CW the ODM for the Original Digital Mode.  It drives all my
> packet and digital mode buddies crazy.  Back during my 60 and 70 WPM days,
I
> was typing faster than most digital people can type, haw.
>
> Phil.
> K0NX
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2