BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Russ Kiehne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:29:03 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (185 lines)
Has anyone got there dxcc using Echolink?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kallie Swanepoel" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: echolink


>I agree on that one - Echo link provides artificial dx.
> 
> 73
> 
> KALLIE ZS6KCS
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David W Wood
> Sent: 18-01-2006 08:54 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: echolink
> 
> 
> Bob and ALL
> 
> why not just turn on your rig and shout?!
> 
> The unpredictability of HF propagation is less challenging than the
> problems of computers!
> 
> David
> 
> 
> In message , Bob Humbert <[log in to unmask]> writes
>>Scotty does a great job of explaining Echolink but Echolink just isn't 
>>as
>>friendly as it could or should be.  I have offered to pay anyone to set
> up 
>>Echolink on my computer and to do a little hand holding with me as I
> try to 
>>learn it to no avail.  It's not really ham radio but until the sun
> settles 
>>down and everyone turns on their HF rigs again it seems to be the only
> game 
>>in town.  Those of you who are good at it; is it as unfriendly as it
> appears 
>>to be or are some of us just too dense to "get it".  Has Freedom
> Scientific 
>>written any special Jaws scripts for it and do they help?
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Kevin Kwan" <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 5:56 AM
>>Subject: Re: echolink
>>
>>
>>> If a station disconnects you go in to your jaw curser and near the 
>>> bottom
>>> it
>>> will list the last station that connected to you. I believe if
> there's an
>>> add on you can put on to echolink that keeps an electronic log so you
> can
>>> keep track of all your missed calls. It might even be a part of the 
>>> program
>>> already for what I know. If so, it sure isn't speechfriendly.Also,
> it's 
>>> been
>>> brought to my atention by a list member that there are scripts you
> can add
>>> on to echolink available for a fee. I don't have the scripts but
> maybe one
>>> of these days I'll look in to it and see if it makes an improvement 
>>> working
>>> with speech. At the moment it's kind of tricky but if you get use to
> some 
>>> of
>>> the keyboard short cuts, you can get around it fairly good. Of
> course, 
>>> it's
>>> still not a hundred percent however, considering the use I get from
>>> echolink, it's working out pretty good.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:19 AM
>>> Subject: Re: echolink
>>>
>>>
>>> if they're connected to you just hit the spacebar or what ever your 
>>> PTT button is, you don't need to do anything else, if they 
>>> disconnect, you just have to find them on the list. I don't think 
>>> there's a way after they disconnect to figure out who called since I 
>>> don't use it hardly ever but there might be. I much rather actually 
>>> get on the air myself.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Fred Olver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:37 AM
>>> Subject: Re: echolink
>>>
>>>
>>> No, guys, if a station out of the blue calls me, with my cursor not 
>>> being
>>> on
>>> the station calling, how do I call them back, understanding that I
> have no
>>> idea where they are on the list?
>>>
>>> Fred Olver  n9bso
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Kevin Kwan" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:28 AM
>>> Subject: Re: echolink
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm not understanding your question actually either. If you're 
>>>> asking about how to respond to a station connecting to your node, 
>>>> asuming you hear them
>>>> connect, just press your space bar or which ever button you've
> costumized
>>>> for transmitting. If you're asking about how you can tell who they
> are, 
>>>> as
>>>> they're connected to you press alt three. You'll hear the person
> call and
>>>> first name.
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Frederick" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:22 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: echolink
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It depends what you mean by get back to them.  Are you talking about
> 
>>>> how to transmit, or how to find the station to connect to them again
> 
>>>> latter?
>>>>                    Mark WZ0K
>>>> God loves you!
>>>> My personal prayer book.
>>>> Add your prayer or pray for others at the following link.
>>>>
>>> http://prayerbook.homewithgod.com/cgi-bin/prayerbook/multi.pl?1319611
>>> 13534708:
>>24:0
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.topica.com/lists/funhamradio.
>>>>
>>>> http://funhamradio.bloki.com
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Fred Olver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 3:01 PM
>>>> Subject: echolink
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Okay, Guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> So my puter is lying to me, anyway, that's what I think, been 
>>>>> getting audio reports today and appears I'm being heard, so now, a 
>>>>> station calls me, they're not on my screne, how do I get back to 
>>>>> them?
>>>>>
>>>>> Fred OLver  n9bso
>>>>>
>>>
>>> __________ NOD32 1.1200 (20050823) Information __________
>>>
>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. 
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> David W Wood
> 
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2