Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:53:29 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I never saw the below reply show up on the list. Beats me why that happens
once and awhile.
Phil.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: IS " 6 6 6 " JUST A FABLE ? ? ?Let me know what you think??
> I have read tons of such King James Bible deconstruction, thus the twisted
> doctrinal and theological interpretation of Scripture, hundreds of times
> over the years. I was not convinced then and I am not convinced now. The
> writers of that article obviously have little knowledge of who the King
> James translators really were but that aside, there translation methods
> likely indicate their agenda which I bet is glaringly obvious elsewhere on
> their website. I'm getting too old to hunt around for it and attempt to
> rebut it though. Besides, it may be true that the mark of the beast is up
> for grabs as far as its meaning but the plain interpretation of Scripture
is
> definitely lost to these guys who wrote this article. I've seen more KJV
> haters in my life than crooked politicians. It is like Lester Rolloff
used
> to say, "The King James Bible doesn't need to be re written, it needs to
be
> re red." Amen, Brother.
>
> Phil.
>
|
|
|