Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:15:23 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In addition to patient testimony [for and against], the advisory
panel heard FDA staffers describe their analysis of hundreds of ECT studies.
As a group, the studies tended to be poorly designed and with too few
patients to allow the drawing of firm conclusions. Many failed to
follow patients long enough to discover the duration of ill effects.
Ones done decades ago studied techniques and electricity dosages
different from current practice.
The FDA staff reported the existing research suggests that for
depression, ECT is more effective than placebo or "sham" shocks and
after a month more effective than antidepressants.
In terms of hazards, the FDA staff's review found the treatment is
associated with "impairment in orientation, memory and global
cognitive function immediately after ECT and up to 6 months." Certain
aspects of memory may return to baseline after six months.
"Autobiographical memory" - recollection of events in one's life -
appears to be at greatest risk. High-dose electric current and
current applied to both sides of the brain are associated with more
thinking and memory problems.
Panel member Christopher A. Ross, a psychiatrist and neuroscientist
at Johns Hopkins University, asked if the published studies
identified any risk factors that predisposed patients to memory loss
and thinking impairment.
"Evidence-based data for that issue just doesn't exist," said Peter
G. Como, a neuropsychologist at the FDA.
Panel Chairman Thomas G. Brott, a neurologist at the Mayo Clinic's
campus in Jacksonville, Fla., said he was amazed that essentially no
research had been done on ECT's effects using functional MRI imaging,
repeated brain wave (EEG) studies, or autopsy examinations of patients.
"I tried to look and saw very little. I concluded that the evidence
is not there to decide either way," he said.
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/28/AR2011012806328_pf.html>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/28/AR2011012806328_pf.html
Powered by LSoft's LISTSERV(R) list management software
|
|
|