Correct. The issue is always more complex than it first appears.
Jim
On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Tracy Bradley wrote:
> I think taking into account the nutritional bang for the buck
> matters also, and what quantities need to be consumed in order to
> be well-nourished and to prevent hunger. Anecdotally, I need a lot
> less beef than I do veg. Grains, man I could eat those all day and
> never feel satisfied!
>
> Day, Wally wrote:
>>> Comparing by volume can be tricky. An acre of wheat can yield
>>> 3000 lbs,
>>> while an acre of tomatoes can yield 40 tons -- obviously a gigantic
>>> difference by volume. However, in terms of available energy
>>> (calories),
>>> the wheat has only about 1/3 less calories per acre than the
>>> tomatoes.
>>> Still less, but not nearly as much as the volume difference would
>>> lead you
>>> to believe.
>>>
>>
>> Another factor to consider - grains can be stored immediately and
>> indefinitley quite easily. Fruits and veggies, however, require a
>> wide range of storage methods (drying, canned, frozen, etc.). What
>> should be added into the above equation - how much of that energy
>> is "lost" because of improper storage methods and/or waste during
>> storage prep? Obvioulsy, it would be best if everyone worldwide
>> ate fresh, off-the-vine, food everyday. But how practical is that?
>> (I can't believe I'm defending grains, but for the sake of
>> discussion I will :)
>>
|