Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 19 Jul 2006 06:34:32 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I wanted the f6a because of the 220 band. There are several 220 repeaters
in the San Francisco bay area. I really like the radio after having it a
few weeks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: e-skip
> the f6A hears alright with a good HF antenna on those bands. I mainly use
> it
> for a 2 meter/440 radio and a scanner. No 220 activity here I can get in
> to.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:37 PM
> Subject: Re: e-skip
>
>
>> It seems like everything else on teh F6 is normal or average. I've even
>> found a way to get HF to work well there with the right antenna. It's no
>> table top or world band receiver though, but something out and about it
>> works well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Butch Bussen wrote:
>>
>>> Ype, tv on the f 6 sucks big time. Main reason I bought the Icom t-90.
>>> Stuff you can't even hear on the f6 is full quieting on the t-90. Still
>>> my favorite radio though, the f6 that is.
>>> 73s
>>> Butch Bussen
>>> wa0vjr
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
|
|
|