Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:26:30 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
some |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:06:03 -0400, Robert Kesterson <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
Medical science
> used to consider bloodletting and amputations as good treatments.
Still does. It's called phlebotomy, and is standard treatment for iron
overload.
>
> Personally, I don't buy the acid/alkaline bit in food because (as others
> noted), the stomach is a highly acid environment.
Me too. Tried it, didn't work.
However, IMHO bone broth is a source of otherwise scarce
minerals/nutrients.
> If your body needs to move some things out of storage (be it bone, fat,
> muscle, or whatever), it will replenish that storage the next time
> nutrients are available. Not to mention I just don't think humans are
> as fragile as that. It seems to me that if our primitive forefathers
> had to be concerned with acid/alkiline balances, fat/carb ratios, or
> whatever, they would have died off before we ever left the trees.
>
True, but we live in a relatively horrendously nutrient-poor environment.
They were rich.
William
|
|
|