Zimbabwe: US and Europe's Disinformation Campaign
Posted on Thursday, March 29 @ 09:36:14 VET
Topic: Zimbabwe
More of the same...
By Ayinde
[log in to unmask]
March 29, 2007
If you flip over the rock of American foreign policy of the past
century, this is what crawls out ...
Invasions, bombings, overthrowing governments, suppressing movements
for social change, assassinating political leaders, perverting
elections, manipulating labor uni0ns, manufacturing "news", death
squads, torture, biological warfare, depleted uranium, drug
trafficking, mercenaries ...
It's not a pretty picture. It is enough to give imperialism a bad
name.
-- William Blum
What is the moral authority of the West based on?
The hypocrisy of these Western leaders, all of whom have the blood of
hundreds of thousands on their hands, makes hollow their outrage over
Zimbabwe. Having already demonstrated the disregard they have for the
lives of ordinary people, they cannot now be the moral authority for
anyone.
Even if African nations wanted to make statements opposing President
Mugabe's governing, the US, UK and Australia are making it difficult
for them to do so with their constant demands and interferences. The
leaders in these Western countries are demanding that leaders of
African nations react harshly to President Robert Mugabe, as if the
African leaders cannot see the tactics they are using in their attempts
to remotely control them. Which African leader really wants to appear
as US and Europe's lacquey?
All the anti-Mugabe reports in the mainstream are suspect as being
part of a disinformation campaign to the point that any person who
takes them seriously is either foolish, dishonest or both.
Here is how the the mainstream media is reporting on the detention of
members of the opposition for questioning following a spate of petrol
bombings at Zanu-PF district offices. The article 'Zimbabwe Opposition
Leader Nabbed' states:
The country's main opposition party leader has been nabbed by police
along with other political opponents of President Robert Mugabe. Party
head Morgan Tsvangirai had been scheduled to talk to media about the
government's recent political violence against the opposition.
Without ever mentioning the reasons these opposition members were held
for questioning, they are making it appear as if peaceful opposition
members were being detained because of their views or intention to
speak to the media.
This is a typical US and European disinformation campaign. The US and
Europe are encouraging the opposition to violently destabilize Zimbabwe
and are supporting them with their disinformation campaign to make it
appear that the government and police are being brutal when attempting
to stop the violence. I know this because this is also typical US
'regime change' conduct.
Here is the government website's version of the arrests in Zimbabwe:
Police yesterday arrested 35 MDC activists and seized explosives and
arms after the recent spate of terror bombings, hours after the ninth
bombing, this time of two petrol tankers in Mutare yesterday morning.
(Police nab 35 MDC activists, confiscate arms, explosives )
Why must we summarily dismiss the police's reason for detaining
persons and only believe the opposition together with US and Europe's
version of events in Zimbabwe? Are they neutral parties who come to us
with clean hands?
So people won't forget the Zimbabwe government's version of the events
that precipitated this latest opposition onslaught that coincided with
the opening of the latest session of the UN Human Rights Council, the
Ambassador of Zimbabwe to Canada, Florence Zano Chideya, reminds us in
her letter 'Zimbabwe's Ambassador Takes Issue with Arrogant
Editorial':
...these MDC supporters masquerading as church-goers were breaking a
section of a law passed by the Zimbabwean parliament, the Public Order
and Safety Act that had been invoked to temporarily ban political
gatherings after the MDC thugs had caused violence the previous week
resulting in the serious injury of four police officers.
This information can be easily verified. Zimbabweans including the
opposition leaders knew the law that temporarily banned political
gatherings and if they wanted they could have challenged the ban in the
courts. Mugabe does not control the courts in Zimbabwe, contrary to
what the West would like the world to believe. The court routinely
rules against the Zimbabwe government.
It should again be noted that the opposition is attempting to gain
political power through the use of violence with support from the US
and European countries, and not from gaining popular support in
Zimbabwe through articulating policies to improve the country.
In the article 'Opposition warning to Mugabe' on BBC's website in
2000, Morgan Tsvangirai is reported to have told a crowd of about
20,000: "What we would like to tell Mugabe is please go peacefully. If
you don't want to go peacefully, we will remove you violently."
The opposition does not command the support of the majority and their
cries of unfair elections rings hollow. Elections seem only to be
considered "free and fair" as long as they serve the interest of the
West. The South African Development Community and the African Uni0n
certified Zimbabwe's elections in 2005 as "free and fair" and this was
rejected by the Western governments (US rejects Southern African
verdict on Zim vote 2005). Although some in the Western mainstream
press blamed the Zimbabwe opposition and their leader, Tsvangirai, for
the MDC's poor showing at the polls, that same media is now resuming
the unfair election diatribe. Blatant Racism is the reason these
Western governments along with their white controlled media feel the
nations in Africa cannot monitor their internal affairs to determine,
without US and European interference, what is "free and fair".
This article 'Call for Tsvangirai to resign after poll' from the
Independent UK blamed the opposition for doing badly at the 2005 polls.
The author Christopher Thompson wrote:
Eric Bloch, a regional political analyst, said there was growing
resentment and "tremendous disillusionment" with the party among MDC
supporters over his handling of the election. It will now need a period
of "extensive restructuring" to survive, he told The Independent. The
ruling Zanu-PF took 78 seats from a possible 120, with the MDC taking
41. That was 17 seats less than in 2000 and the result gives Mr Mugabe
the power to change the constitution and install a successor without
first having to call elections, as presently necessary. It is feared
that Mr Mugabe will use his majority to bring in a senate system of
government, which was rejected in a 2000 referendum.
Mr Tsvangirai has come under fire for failing to sufficiently
capitalise on spiralling inflation, widespread unemployment and food
shortages. His policy of threatening to boycott the elections back in
September 2004, only to do an about turn in February this year, led to
far fewer MDC voters registering than anticipated. This was reflected
in the low turn-out of MDC support, especially in rural areas, where
Zanu-PF dominated. Analysts said the MDC had, in part, been a victim of
its own early success.
The opposition failed at the polls and then cried foul. They are now
trying to gain power via a coup and want us to believe that they are
promoting democracy.
Zimbabweans should continue to reject the constant meddling of foreign
governments in their internal politics. They are right to see the MDC
as a foreign-sponsored party whose mandate is to uphold the Western
neoliberal structural adjustment programme and halt land reclamation.
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
|