BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Sender:
"B-P Golden Oldies: \"Is this the list with all the ivy haters?\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 5 May 2006 07:08:59 -0500
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"B-P Golden Oldies: \"Is this the list with all the ivy haters?\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
30 perms represents 10x more water vapor transmission through a film of 
specified thickness per unit of time under specified temperature and humidity 
differential. Or the short version: Yeah, it's ten times more breathable than 
3 perms.

1 perm is a somewhat arbitrary value that is generally considered to be the 
dividing line between breathable and non-breathable. Materials like epoxy 
coatings and terra cotta glaze (unless cracked or spalled) are close to zero.

Mike E.

  So are 30-50 perms  10x 
> more or 10x  less breathable than 3-5? What numbers do we want to 
> permit vapor  transmission (isn't that what we're measuring with 
> perms?), and what  numbers do we want to block vapor transmission 
> (which I assume we  theoretically want to do  sometimes? 

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2