Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 4 Oct 2006 18:00:12 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
John,
I see your point if you've got very limited space; just more stuff to
knock around. At least the control head for my 480 has a couple of
different mounting options. There's a base which has four rubber
feet, and another one with screw holes in it for mounting in a fixed
location. I use the one with the feet because I like being able to
move the head around the table. My cables are strung so that it's
not easy to knock the head off the table, and I haven't broken the
cable after almost two years. Do the control heads for the dual band
radios have any kind of mounting options? I would think they would have to.
Steve
On Wednesday 10/4/06 13:06 John Miller wrote:
>there is no out of the way with my setup and it's in plain view. It has to
>look kind of decent.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:45 PM
>Subject: Re: grr
>
>
> > I'm with you, Howard. I like the idea of putting the radio somewhere
> > out of the way, and placing the control head near the front edge of
> > the operating table. Then I just sit back, relax, and enjoy the radio.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > On Wednesday 10/4/06 12:25 Howard Kaufman wrote:
> >>I have always been amazed at your insistence to having the control
> >>head connected to the radio in a base station setting, is it just
> >>asthetic prefference? Is their a practical reason that I haven't thought
> >>of?
> >>
> >>It took me five minutes to fall in love with the freedom of position
> >>both radio and control head to get me to fall in love with the
> >>idea. Maybe I am missing something practical?
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >>Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.12/462 - Release Date: 10/3/2006
> >
|
|
|