Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:54:10 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am still in spokane currently am still trying to move over to olympia
though.
I reached kurklin earlier I am currently using a really old midlan mobile
rig it doesn't have any tone functionality how ever. I am wanting to try to
use the echolink repeater on the south hill part of town.
this rig was loaned to me buy a local ham until I can get my own rig. thanks
73
hank smith
amiture radio call sign:
KE7IEF
email:
[log in to unmask]
msn messenger:
[log in to unmask]
aim:
hanksmith5
skype:
hanksmith5
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ham Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 11:28 AM
Subject: Mobile vs. HT Radio
> Hank,
>
> It all depends. If you're still in Spokaloo, as I was in the 80's, there
> are lots of repeaters you can work with just a hand-held. There were a
> couple that were linked as well.
>
> From my QTH on the north side, I did have a ten watt box at the time
> running
> thru a 2-meter beam. One of the things you could do with that is bounce
> it
> off one of the mountains and work into Yakima and occasionally the
> Tricities. I also checked into a simplex net and could use the beam to
> work
> into Idaho and sometimes Western Montana.
>
> But, if you don't have a decent two-meter antenna, you probably won't be
> able to work much more than the local repeaters anyway. So, in that case,
> I
> think I'd opt for a hand-held and you could always buy a small power
> supply
> and a 2-50 watt VHF amp if you ever need more power from your home QTH.
> The
> only drawback to this is that typically, the front-end in an HT won't be
> as
> selective as the front end of a good mobile rig.
>
> Steve, K8SP
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1663 (20060716) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
|
|
|