Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 16 May 2006 17:04:14 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
NO, nothing is wrong, but I was just wondering if any of you take any
advantage of that band at all?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: just an item of interest and an observation
> something wrong with CB frequencies?
> Just cuz they're not hams doesn't mean they should automatically be
> blocked
> from general coverage receivers....
> Same reason many general coverage receivers have the 45-50MHZ band in
> them...not because there is much there, other then baby monitors and some
> older cordless phones but because its just part of the general coverage...
>
> regards
> Colin
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:35 PM
> Subject: just an item of interest and an observation
>
>
>> Hi everyone, I have noticed that a lot of the radios I have gotten have
> the
>> CB channels as coverage. I don't listen to them that much, and haven't
>> operated on CB for years, but I have noticed that with my DX-390 and my
> F6a,
>> and my scanners I have CB coverage. I am just wondering why so many
> radios
>> have this? I happened to tune by someone on the CB band this afternoon
> and
>> shall we say he was conducting himself in a way that the ham community
> would
>> frown on.
>>
>>
|
|
|