BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:02:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
I think it's people are so lazy and think echolink is even 1/4 as good so 
they don't go to the work to set up stuff on HF
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: Mel's Hole


Hi Phil.

And why should we be able to chew away at the ozone layer, change the
chemical composition of the atmosphere with greenhouse gases and still
think that it won't have any effect on how radio signals travel through
it?  I'm being serious, now.

Anyway, I thought the flat bands were my lousy antennas!  Being that I have
a city lot, the antennas aren't very high or long.  A G5RV was the biggest
antenna I could stuff in the lot, and I had to bend it at that to make it 
fit.

My suspicious mind wonders if the governments and the HF broadcasters know
that things are declining, and that it is an expensive medium to operate in
and that's why so many of them are pulling the plug on HF.

73, de Lou K2LKK



At 06:12 PM 2/6/2006 -0700, you wrote:
>Louis,
>
>I got the drift and I thought I knew what BPL stood for but wasn't 
>positive.
>Regardless, with as much sun spot activity we have going, the band sshould
>be red hot and they aren't so it does make you wonder.
>
>Phil.
>K0NX

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753

ATOM RSS1 RSS2