BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Walt Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:38:33 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
And calling it "free" radio is a stretch if ever there was one. We all pay 
for both the overblown contracts that these syndicated yammerheads get and 
the exhorbitant rates that they're able to charge their advertisers. In 
fact, so-called "free" radio is precisely one of the reasons I bought XM in 
the first place. I don't care if I never hear those yahoos peddling their 
poor quality vacuum cleaners and overpriced pseudo-audio equipment again. As 
Robert Heinlein said, TANSTAAFL(*).

(*) There ain't no such thing as a free lunch

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: BJS XM Radio needs our help


until they get rid of half the commercials, maybe more, as far as I'm
concerned it can go far far away.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2