EASI Archives

Equal Access to Software & Information: (distribution list)

EASI@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
RAJIV SHAH <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:31:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
Hi Mary,

I'm sorry if this response to yur question comes in delayed
fashion, but I have been busy of late, but wished to write
nonetheless.

At work, we have evaluated one Blackboard course produced by
George Washington University with regard to Section 508. The
course matter involved individuals with dimentia. For the
most part, I remember it being accessible. The only issue
involved our ability (or rather inability) to register for
the course using both the latest versions of JAWS and
WindowEyes screen readers.

I hope this info helps.

Regards,

Rajiv Shah

---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:24:57 -0500
>From: "Mary J. Barnett" <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Blackboard Learning System v. 6 - Question about
Access Issues
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>Hi!
>
>Texas Woman's University in Denton, Texas recently upgraded
its DE
>software, Blackboard, to version 6. The university is
hosting a workshop
>presented by Blackboard and one of the topics to be covered
is
>accessibility.
>
>Unfortunately, I won't be able to attend because I will be
teaching.
>Does anyone have any information about current access issues
with
>Blackboard 6? Are there examples of Blackboard's provision
for "access"
>and instances where it falls short? Instances where it
succeeds?
>
>Dr. Mary J. Barnett
>Denton, Texas

ATOM RSS1 RSS2