Thanks for that advice Gale. I am asuming for now that the absence of hunger
or cravings means that I am getting sufficient nutrients, perhaps for the
first time in ages. Although I mainly eat grass fed lamb or kangaroo meat
I'm pretty sure that their current EFA profile is lower than wild game in
paleolithic times. There are a plethora of dietary experts out there but at
the end of the day as you suggest it is better to listen my body and blood
sugar readings and not get confused by the 'science'.
Leonie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gale" .
The only logical thing to do (in my mind) is to start with a theoretical
paleo diet (theoretical because there is no way of knowing precisely what a
paleo diet would be and, if we could know it, not likely having the ability
to faithfully reproduce it) and add items like PUFAs measuring your
individual response. Assuming that something cannot be healthy for you
because it didn't exist in paleolithic times is as unsound as animal rights
people assuming that meat cannot be good for them - because they want it to
be so.