hey, guys, i have enjoyed badgering you, but, the
hands are beginning to hurts so i am going to try to
get off. 

--- ken barber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> r u sure? you have not read some of the released
> documents, but, once again to know about them you'd
> have to go to the right government sites and get
> beyond the 6:00 alphbet soup evening news. 
> 
> 
> --- Anthony Arnold <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> 
> > I don't know what we're currently trying Hussein
> and
> > his brother for, but
> > they had no involvement in September 11th, so why
> > are we over there besides
> > to take our frustration out on somebody.  But on
> the
> > other hand, if I would
> > become the president tomorrow, I wouldn't pull out
> > immediately as some would
> > like to see, I would personally like to fix what
> my
> > country has done.  It's
> > like if I accidentally dropped a cigarette on
> > somebody's carpet and it burns
> > a hole, I would feel oppogated to replace their
> > carpet, no matter what.  
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Anthony 
> > Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cerebral Palsy List
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> > Kendall David Corbett
> > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 6:49 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: FW: was dental question now iraq war.
> > 
> > Ken,
> > 
> > Whether the Iraqis are better off is a tough call;
> > they may (or may not,
> > some would argue) have greater civil liberties,
> but
> > their lives may be
> > in greater immediate danger than they were under
> > Hussein. =20
> > 
> > On the opposite side of that coin, many would
> argue
> > that we in the US
> > are safer, but have had our civil liberties
> eroded. 
> > It was said in the
> > immediate post 9/11 period that the terrorists
> > wanted to destroy the
> > American (read US) way of life, and they have made
> a
> > start toward that,
> > IMHO.
> > 
> > As I read UN Resolution 1441, it doesn't
> explicitly
> > give member states
> > of the UN permission to undertake unilateral
> > military action against
> > Iraq.  That does seem to be permissible under UN
> > resolutions 678 and
> > 687, which were signed in 1990 and 1991,
> > respectively. =20
> > 
> > My point is that the armed forces presently
> engaged
> > as coalition
> > partners do not wear UN uniforms, and as such are
> > not formally
> > recognized as UN forces.
> > 
> > Kendall=20
> > 
> > An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's
> > redundant!)
> > 
> > The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
> the
> > unreasonable one
> > persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
> > Therefore, all
> > progress depends on the unreasonable man.
> > 
> > -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ken barber [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20
> > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:54 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: FW: was dental question now iraq war.
> > 
> >   actually resolution 1441 passed without desent,
> > but,
> > then when it got time to actually follow through,
> > then
> > the germans, french, and russians backpeddled and
> > would not follow through. 1441 gave any member
> > nation
> > the right to enforce it. the u.s. and the brits
> with
> > a
> > few more did exactly that.=20
> >   it appears that the intelligence worldwide was
> > wrong
> > on lagre amounts of weapons of mass destruction
> > unless
> > you believe that ranking iragi general that says
> > they
> > flew them to syria. the media is ignoring him. i'd
> > guess some of you have heard nothing about him up
> to
> > just this email. but, either way i'll ask the
> > question. do you think iragis are better off now
> > than
> > before the invasion? your honest answer should
> > pretty
> > well tell you if the war is right or wrong. don't
> > wealsel out, they are either better off without
> > saddam
> > or they were better off with him.=20
> > 
> > --- Kendall David Corbett <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > 
> > > Let me send this again, so the link stays
> intact!
> > >=20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kendall David Corbett
> > > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20
> > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:59 PM
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: dental question
> > >=20
> > > Anthony,
> > >=20
> > > President Bush tried to get UN approval for the
> > war
> > > in Iraq, and was
> > > turned down.  He then formed a coalition of
> > partner
> > > nations for the war,
> > > which included the US, England, Australia,
> Canada,
> > > and a few others that
> > > I can't recall right now.
> > >=20
> > > This is a link to an article in the Washington
> > Post
> > > from August of 2002
> > > that talks about members of the present
> President
> > > Bush's administration
> > > saying that the President didn't even need
> > > Congressional approval for
> > > the present Iraq war, since Congress had
> approved
> > > the use of military
> > > force in 1991 when Iraq invaded Kuwait, and the
> > > Kuwaiti government made
> > > a formal request for help.
> > >=20
> > >
> >
>
www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A61040-2002Aug25?language=3Dprinter
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > Kendall=20
> > >=20
> > > An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's
> > > redundant!)
> > >=20
> > > The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
> > the
> > > unreasonable one
> > > persists in trying to adapt the world to
> himself.
> > > Therefore, all
> > > progress depends on the unreasonable man.
> > >=20
> > > -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Anthony Arnold
> > > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20
> > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 2:29 PM
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: dental question
> > >=20
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com