Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 3 May 2006 21:45:45 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Edison and Dan may have to debate specifics on this one, but I agree with
Ralph - Ellen's instincts are right. The wood has to breathe. On top of
that, with these types of paints the building loses lots of visual
character. If I recall correctly, the paint goes on much thicker than normal
paint and so crisp lines are lost. We've had lots of discussions in our
office about similar products, although I don't recall Rhino specifically
(or Edison, for that matter). Maybe some brands are fine. While some
historic district commissions cannot regulate paint color, they should be
able to regulate treatment, which includes choosing a paint that will not
cause long-term damage to the historic building. Perhaps the company could
provide examples of its use or a sample to view. You should definitely ask
to see its application/approval in other historic districts. And, by all
means, make sure someone will be able to remove it in a few years when we
all find out what the true story is.
bamh.
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|