VICUG-L Archives

Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List

VICUG-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:44:49 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (81 lines)
Hi Bill, With Windows XP, you can use high colour and a resolution of 800x
600 with all versions that work with XP, that means you can start with JAWS
version 4.02.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sun Sounds of Arizona" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 10:58 AM
Subject: JAWS and display settings


>I would like to apologize for giving out a piece of incorrect information
> about JAWS and display settings.  Gosh I hate to  be wrong. I am also
> grateful that one of the list members sent me a note correcting me
> because,
> it enabled me to fix a couple of nagging problems I've been having myself.
>
> I wrote that JAWS prefers 256 color depth to function properly.  That was
> true for the version I use on one of my older computers version 4.5.
> However, versions 5 and 6 recommend 32 bit color depth and 1024 x765
> resolution.
>
> This does bring up one gripe though.  I have installed many versions of
> JAWS
> over the years starting with JFW 2.0 up to JAWS 6.1.  Though the
> recommended
> display settings are found in the section called system requirements, the
> change in display capability is nowhere in the "what's new" section.  When
> I
> installed the new versions, I was not prompted to alter my display
> settings,
> nor did JAWS just do it.  Though perhaps, it should have occurred to me to
> check system requirements, it didn't because I had a brand new computer.
> I
> had installed v4.5 initially because that is what I had available and
> could
> afford at the time.  It forced me to cut back the color depth and
> resolution
> to work properly.  Then I got hold of v5.1 and installed it.  It acted
> more
> poorly than I would have hoped.  The reason?  It wanted to see 32 bit
> color,
> but didn't bother to tell me!
>
> This brings me to one of my major issues with adaptive software in
> general.
> Much of it requires that the blind user be more of a techie than the
> typical
> person in the general community has to be.  Actually, I am a bit of a
> techie
> thank goodness.  Even so, I missed this one and it has caused me a lot of
> trouble.  The advent of personal computers has meant a great deal to me
> and
> many other blind people.  However, until the expense becomes reasonable,
> and
> the adaptive technology becomes more truly integrated, it will continue to
> frustrate, and unduly limit the access blind people might have.
>
> Thanks all, this list is probably the most useful general tech resource I
> know of.
>
> Bill
>
>
> VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
> To join or leave the list, send a message to
> [log in to unmask]  In the body of the message, simply type
> "subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
> VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
> http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html
>
>


VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask]  In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
 VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2