Sister Jabou and Joe,
Its good we are taking time discussing this issue. Joe, just a few
stats. In 2003, about 45% of economically active population reported
being employed, 49% of these are in agriculture and animal husbandry
(Census 2003). In other words no more than 25% of our economically
active population really work on the farm. During a recent visit to the
village (Feb 2006) it dawned on me that over 90% of my cohorts(Kafo)
were either in Kombo or outside the country. The figure is much higher
for younger people, many of whom leave the village as soon as they get
to 9th grade just to arrive in Kombo to realise that their only chance
to a living is to trek across the Sahara or hitch-hike on canoes to
Spain and Canary Islands.
Joe, few Gambians depend entirely on the farming these days. Many would
tell you they survive todays challenges because of remittance from
family members who trekked or hitch-hiked their way to Europe and
America. No wonder you still find fathers and mothers selling the last
cow/jewelry or compound for their middle-school dropout to risk
everything including their life to Europe or the US. Some Baddibunka
man told me "in the past we travelled to Barra/Banjul or Cassamance
(smuggling) to make a living.We will go to Europe if we have to." In
sum, the drain will continue as long as it is the fastest way to a
decent living. One that would help a Baddibunka man or a Sarahule man
(who can't read/ write their name) feed his family and save enough to
become the new landlord in the "Tubab Banko".
Given the above, the question is how do we make the most of our buck
with all the domestic and international variables at play? There is no
doubt in my mind that the farmer in Sare Mankamang Kunda would give up
life on the farm for a college degree for his child. And whether that
child lives in Basse, Banjul or Seatle matters very little in today's world.
Malanding
[log in to unmask] wrote:
>Malanding,
>
>While I agree with you that peanut farming is not the answer to our economic
>woes and I certainly do not have the answers, but I am just a little taken
>aback by your suggestion that we train people and then farm them out for
>employment in the West. Isn't that worsening the brain drain problem and what
>about developing the home front if we invest in educating our youth and then
>sending them out to go work in other countries?
>
>I can assure you that if I was able to find opportunities at home, I would
>not have ventured elsewhere and I have head this same sentiment expressed by
>many.
>
>Rather than framing out our youth to the West, I think one area that the
>economies of African countries in particular can be greatly improved is if the
>Western countries like the U.S and U.K for example open up trade and allow
>African goods to be exported to these countries without any of the current
>restrictions and quotas that result in imbalance of trade against Africa. Along
>with that, rather than institutions like the IMF and World Bank lining the
>pockets of corrupt governments on the continent and sinking African countries
>deeper and deeper into debt, and if the intention is to help Africa as they
>claim, some of those funds can be used to make capital available to African
>entrepreneurs to start businesses and to encourage Africans to buy African and
>keep the money at home and create jobs locally.
>
>As someone involved in the import/export business, it pains me daily when I
>see that all the commodities we use on a daily basis in Africa is imported
>and even when it comes to the procurement of those commodities, the various
>African governments who place orders for these goods bypass African companies
>in the business to utilize outside companies mainly because they are looking
>for kickbacks in the transaction. In the case of Gambia, the APRC have
>essentially taken this business from the small business person and turned it into a
>monopoly for a select few.
>
>If you look at the U.S government, the Small Business Administration puts a
>lot of priority in assisting entrepreneurs to set up businesses, from
>providing grants, low interest loans and free services to prepare business plans and
>free mentoring from retired executives in SCORE ( Service Corps of Retired
>Executives)who volunteer their services through the SBA all intended to
>encourage those who are so inclined to start small businesses. All of this because
>they realize the impact that the creation of small businesses has on the
>economy from increasing tax revenue to the creation of employment opportunities
>for the general public. The U.S government also provides many good incentives
>to small businesses if they create jobs and they also encourage economic
>growth in rural areas by providing grants to entrepreneurs through the community
>development block grants program if they will start businesses in these
>rural areas.
>
>Of course single crop farming is an evil practice that was implemented by
>colonial governments who basically assigned each of the countries they
>colonized different crops to grow which they could then buy and import into the
>Mother country namely the U.K in our case. When this system was devised, the
>economic well being of the colonized country did not feature in the decision.
>Instead, it was designed with the intention to meet the needs of the colonist
>country who only cared that they had different providers for what they needed
>in their own economies without worrying about the impact on the colonized
>country then or in the long run.
>
>In terms of agriculture, encouraging farmers to grow multiple crops that can
>both be consumed at home as well as that have a market outside the country
>and working to help them gain access to these markets are other alternatives
>that can be looked at. Getting more people interested in growing for example
>vegetables and even organic herbs to name a few, and to establish industries
>such as canning and freezing of vegetables and our local fruits for export
>etc, and even tapping into the garment industry in the West by assisting
>entrepreneurs to tap into this market by helping them to get manufacturing
>contracts such as are offered to people in Asia are all things that our government
>can give priority to in discussions with our development partners instead of
>taking more loans that has no impact on the condition of the average citizen
>in our country or elsewhere in Africa.
>
>Also working to change the mind set that imported items are better than
>locally made or locally grown will go a long way in helping to keep money at home.
>
>I believe that there are so many ways in which economic growth can be
>stimulated in The Gambia and the rest of Africa without compromising our own growth
>in other areas and instead of training our youth and then farming them out
>with all the accompanying negative effects that may have in our overall
>advancement.
>
>It is certainly an excellent topic of debate to see what options we have
>towards finding a solution to this dilemma.
>
>Jabou Joh
>
>
>In a message dated 9/13/2006 3:06:15 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
>[log in to unmask] writes:
>Malanding Jaiteh <[log in to unmask]> wrote: If one is to go by the NADD
>Manifesto, The Alliance's Document and the
>statement by SoS Touray that the APRC government is to provide farmers
>500 tractors, looks like Gambians are poised for the same old, same old
>- dump more of our hard borrowed cash into the agriculture basket. By
>now it should be clear to all that the trouble in the agricultural
>sector is more than just lack of funding. Few would disagree that
>dispite two governments, aid from two Chinas plus the West and even
>Iran, countless Departments of Agriculture, projects (Mixed Farming,
>GARD, Jahali-Pacharr, LADEP) institutions and agencies (NARI, NADA),
>and billion of Dalasi, the Gambia is neither self-sufficient in food
>production nor has it increase earning from agriculture. Infact the
>contribution of agriculture to our national economy has been on the
>decline while all these is going on. Given the current state of the
>physical environment (climate and water resources) and economic
>environment (globalization and crop pricing), it is hard to imagine what
>agriculture can do for the Gambia.
>Given the above, I would argue that it is high time we take a second
>look at agriculture (represented by the Axe and the Hoe on our coat of
>arm) as the engine to national development efforts since independence.
>I would go a step further to ask the incoming government (APRC, NADD or
>The Alliance) to make a "put man on the moon" kind of declaration on
>education. Cornerstone of this would be immediate expansion of the
>University system and begining 2010 to train free of charge:
>
>2500 undergraduate degree and 100 graduates each year (2010 - 2015)
>5000 undergrads and 500 graduate degrees ( after 2015)
>
>In addition to free training, the government should negotiate with US,
>EU and other large economies to help provide these with temporary worker
>visa. In return the students will be required to pay through their
>employers 10% of their salary towards re-embursing the Gambia
>government. The idea is to borrow and invest in a product more
>marketable than peanuts.
>
>Some back of the envelop calculation:
>At the end of the fourth year, with 10000 students * $2,500 per year
>tuition is $25,000,000 (the cost of 500 tractors)
>suppose 50% of those landed in a job in the UK or US ($35000) per year.
>Remittance at 10% of salary is $3,500 * 5000 = $17,500,000. Nay Bad!
>and defintely more than what we get from peanuts these days.
>This would not include money sent home to family and friend, on
>vacations (knowing you do not have to worry about the visa office), on a
>retirement house or two (every Gambians wish).
>Infact we are losing that many to immigration as we speak. Just that the
>ones we are losing now are less prepared to survive in Babilon, with
>barely a driver license much more a high school diploma to compete the
>skilled labor from Poland or Mexico.
>
>Perhaps I am just dreaming. Certainly I do hope its a dream come true.
>
>Malanding Jaiteh
>
>いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
>To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
>at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>
>To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
>To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>[log in to unmask]
>いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
>
>
>
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
|