BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Clarence <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:45:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
I have a mfj-993 tuner.  I like the cw output and the audible swr indicator.
But I suspect that the ldg is just as good.
73,
Clarence

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: tuner info


> MFJ is a hit or miss company, when they make something good, they make it
> good, when they don't, they don't, I've had things I had to fix out of the
> box that worked great but there are no complaints on LDG, I  personally,
> would go with LDG for tuners, but MFJ has made a few good tuners over the
> years.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 6:26 PM
> Subject: tuner info
>
>
> Hi;
> A number of folks have commented on some of the mfj automatic tuners.  I'm
> wondering how they compare price wise and performance wise with the ldg?
> I
> made the assumption that the ldg was the tuner of choice.  I am using a
> older but quite usable icom tuner but I can't help being curious.
> Rich

ATOM RSS1 RSS2