Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:42:17 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The only way echolink would be slightly interpreted as having a qso is if rf
is involved with the communication. If it's from pc to pc then I would think
no. Simply because voip isn't radio. As a matter of fact, some would say
that repeater work isn't real radio in a sense because you're getting help
to make the contact. Even though you need an antenna system to get on any
repeater--even if it's just a piece of kowax, you still have to get in to
the machines, no matter where they're located. Some people resent the fact
that younger hams are only interested in 2 meters and 440. I know some real
fanatics that claim they've never worked two meters, wouldn't even consider
it. So to ask if using repeaters threw the pc is radio, is kind of ironic.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 1:25 PM
Subject: REFLECTIONS
Hi;
As for operating a separate transmitter and receiver it wasn't a big deal.
In many ways other than tune up it was easier than the radios of today.
Remember there were no menu items, no dsp settings or audio filter settings
for that matter.
I suspect the ease of chatting with someone in another continent may have
taken some of the thrill out of calling cq and getting a reply.
Unfortunately you can do very similar things on line with much less fuss or
fun for that matter.
As for echo link, do they need something now in addition to your call sign?
I signed up some time ago but only needed a call sign. The echo link jury
is very much out. Is it just a chat room, a real qso? I haven't decided.
Rich
|
|
|