BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Louis Kim Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 May 2005 18:46:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Yes, but they would have to raise your taxes $5000 to pay for it, and when
a sufficient number of baby boomers went blind, the whole system would
collapse!

73, de Lou K2LKK

At 04:29 PM 5/30/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>I don't think competition has helped us.  How about having the government
>take over Freedom Scientific and just give it to everyone who can use it.
>It would be cheaper for the tax payers in the long run.  How much would a
>copy cost? fifty sense?
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 12:31 PM
>Subject: jfw
>
>
> > hi;
> > The thing that will make jfw almost impossible to replace is partly the
> > name
> > "job" access with speech.  Thus most vocational agencies seem to latch on
> > to
> > jfw.  It would be interesting to know what percentage of jfw sales are
> > private and what percentage are from individuals?  I am left with the very
> > unscientific impression that window-eyes seems to deal with significantly
> > more individual purchases as opposed to agencies.
> > Rich
> >

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753

ATOM RSS1 RSS2