That I don't know. My th79a quit working a couple of years ago. I need to
get a new ht.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Bishop" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: k1man
> Russ,
>
> ARe the k7ij repeaters still up? Can't hear them down here in Merced of
> course. They certainly have an interesting history if you like that sort
> of thing.
>
> But, don't think it's as bad as the 147.435 repeater, at least based on
> what I've heard about that one.
>
> Don W6SMB
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:54:39 -0800, Russ Kiehne wrote:
>
> How many of you remember this?
>
> K7IJ Repeater Agreement
> May 11, 1999
> K7IJ Repeaters are to come back on the air under the following terms:
> 1. At all times that K7IJ repeaters are operating, there will be a
> live,
> real time control operator, listening to the communications. The
> Control
> Operator may be the licensee or a licensed operator chosen by the
> licensee.
> 2. An audio stream will be configured so that the Commission may
> monitor the
> repeaters at any time the repeaters are on.
> 3. Stations coming on to the repeaters, if not known by the control
> operator,
> will be asked to identify at the beginning of their transmission, not
> just
> after ten minutes.
> 4. (a). If unlicensed stations come on to the repeaters, an
> announcement will
> be made by the Control Operator that the repeater does not welcome or
> tolerate unlicensed users. In cases where unlicensed operators persist
> in
> communications over the repeater, the repeater will be turned off by
> the
> Control Operator and the matter reported to the Commission.
> (b). When licensed stations are not abiding by Commission rules in
> their operation on the repeaters, they will be asked to correct their
> operation to comply with the Amateur rules. In cases where a licensed
> operator persists in violating Commission rules, the Control Operator,
> on a
> case by case basis, may decide to (1) turn the repeater off; or (2)
> leave the
> repeater in operation and report the matter to the Commission.
> (c). In both situations (a) and (b) above, the responsibility of the
> licensee of K7IJ is subject to the provisions of Section 97.205(g) of
> the
> Commission's Rules relating to inadvertent retransmissions by
> repeaters.
> 5. No further action will be taken against K7IJ or Blake Jenkins,
> N6YSA, if
> the repeaters are operated in accordance with these conditions.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Kwan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 12:43 PM
> Subject: Re: k1man
>
>
>> The reason glen is not listed on qrz is because of his obvious
>> controversy
>> which got him kicked from that data base. In fact that was an on going
>> issue
>> with him when he found out he was removed from the data base. Of course
>> since every ham is listed there, to not be listed is embarrassing. If you
>> want another call to look up like that, try w6nut. The previous owner of
>> the
>> infamous 147-435 repeater in la. That repeater has been sited for several
>> violations. The sociopaths on that machine flaunt fcc rules everyday.
>> It's
>> to the point that the repeater owner doesn't want the machine to run when
>> he's not listening. That still doesn't stop people from using the
>> frequency
>> though. They still pile up and jam each other on the input of the
>> repeater.
>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1463 (20060330) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
|