Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 30 Dec 2005 07:47:25 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I still find XMLog the best for JAWS out of the box with no real
modification or scripting needed. Unlike a lot of windows logging software,
it reads the fields to you as you tab through it and is pretty accessible.
The only problem is that it is not contesting software.
I would like to try N3FJP's software but to my knowledge, it will not
interface with the radio such as TRLog does for contesting and does not make
it as easy to work a contest. Particularly, I would like it to interface
with the parallel port to send CW.
This discussion is interesting however so I look forward to reading more.
Take care all and very 73.
--------------------
Kevin :)
Amateur Radio: K7RX
----- Original Message -----
From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 07:39
Subject: Re: logging software
> Rich:
>
> I think the two logging software programs are very similar in what they
> can
> do. It's more of a matter of which one works the best with Jaws.
>
> I am now working with the n3fjp software since I have bought the complete
> software package, and if I can't get the n3fjp general logging program to
> work, I'll start working with the other one.
>
> One thing that is particularly intriguing to me is the rig-computer
> interface possibility with both programs, but that's down the road yet. I
> want to get one program or the other working better before I start
> exploring
> that possibility.
>
> I hope that others on the list who try either of these general logging
> programs will give us all feedback and suggestions based on their
> experiences, because that will help us all.
>
> Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 9:56 AM
> Subject: Re: logging software
>
>
>> Hi Tom;
>> Thanks, I new I had heard mention of something like that but couldn't put
> my
>> finger on the name. How does this differ from the software you are
>> currently trying to get to work with jfw?
>> Rich
>>
|
|
|