Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:25:02 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>> > From: =3D?windows-1252?Q?Philip?=3D <[log in to unmask]>
So, for example, I don't do well when I eat =
> organic
> whole grain hot cereal or whole milk,
*** Does this include raw milk, or only pasteurized/homogenized? I didn't
mean to say I was eating grains of any kind, although I do think the more
highly processed they are the worse they are. Start out bad and go downhill
from there.
> There are not too many retail energy bars that have strictly "Paleo"
> ingredients--
*** No, many have bizarre unpronounceable ingredients, but the nutrient
profile matches the Paleo profile.
> Also, it seems to me that a real =
> Paleo
> purist would eat pemmican rather than an energy bar, even a home-made =
> bar,
> wouldn't they? So I don't see opposition to energy bars as being =
> non-Paleo.
*** Depends on which Paleo guru you're talking to--I mentioned (some) energy
bars as being in common with canola oil--certainly neither is a paleo
ingredient, but both have been recommended by some as consistent with a
paleo diet.
> Does that mean I should say
> I don't agree with the basic theory of Paleolithic nutrition because I
> disagree with Cordain about honey?
*** Of course not. I agree with the basic theory of Paleo nutrition, and I
find all of the authors/advocates to have valuable input. I think some stray
pretty far off the mark from time to time, though, your honey example being
a prime one. I've seen modern hunter/gathers risk life and limb to obtain
raw honey, and bees predate humans by millions of years, I believe.
--Carrie
|
|
|