BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kevin Nathan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Kevin Nathan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Jul 2005 12:04:31 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I wonder if this is the Alpha Delta?  I have the DX-A which mounts to the
tower and looks like an inverted Vee with one element for 80 meters about 65
feet long and the other for 40 and 160 that is 55 feet long witha  loading
coil/trap in it.  they work quite well but it is a noisy antenna compared to
receiving on a dipole.  Alpha Delta also makes a single sloper called the
DX-B which is for 160, 80 and 40 but I can't remember how long it is.

Take care all and very 73.

Kevin :)
Amateur Radio:  K7RX
Navy Marine Corps MARS:  NNN0SHS
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 10:35
Subject: Re: antena


> Rich,
>
> The Delta Loop is shorter than a dipole, because a typical installation
> uses
> the tower as a tophat capacitive load for the antenna.  Alpha-Delta makes
> commercial models, and from what I've heard, they do quite well and have a
> lower takeoff angle than a dipole because of the influence of the tower.
>
> The only reason I don't have one is that I have a guyed tower and there
> would
> be a lot of interaction between the guy wires and the antenna.  I'm not
> sure
> how much it would degrade the performance, but there would be some.
>
> Steve, K8SP

ATOM RSS1 RSS2