BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 May 2005 21:41:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (103 lines)
Hi Colin;

I can't give you anything that would resemble a silver bullet for code.

I can only tell you what worked for me.

I used Gordon West's tapes for my five words per minute.

Also, I augmented my studies by listening to cw off the air and listening to
the W1AW ARRL broadcasts.

The broadcasts were particularly useful because you never knew what letter
or word was coming up next.

However, when you listen to the QSO's, the format gives it away.

73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: cw versus txt messaging


>    Colin:
>
> All I can say is "practice, practice, practice!".  In addition, be sure
> you
> are learning the code using the Farnsworth method, where the character
> speed
> is about 15 WPM, and the sending speed is 5 WPM.  The sending speed is
> determined by the space between the characters.
>
> As you get more comfortable with the code, try to increase the sending
> speed
> to about 7 or 8 WPM;  that way, the 5 WPM test will seem like a piece of
> cake when you get there, which will help during the stress of the test.
>
> Try to find a way to review QSO segments such as those that appear on
> license exams.  Most CW practice materials have such qsos in them already.
>
> Finally, as you are copying the code, don't look back to try and figure
> out
> what was sent as more code is being given.  This just causes you to fall
> behind, and usually gets to the point where you can't catch up.  Just copy
> what you think you hear, and put things together later from your notes.
>
> Hope this helps a little.
>
> Best 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 8:33 PM
> Subject: Re: cw versus txt messaging
>
>
>> speaking of CW.
>> I am working on becoming perficient at 5 words a minute to pass the CW
> 5WPM
>> requirement to get HF privilages here in Canada.
>> What i am looking for are any bad habbits i should watch out for while
>> learning the code, as well as any general, or even specific tips and
> tricks
>> that experienced hams can pass on to me regarding the learning of the
> code.
>> My goal is to be perficient enough in CW at 5WPM in order to pass the 3
>> minute send, and three minute receiving of cw at 5WPM that is required by
>> the test, by the 25th of June.
>> In other words, i want this thing mastered, or at least where i am good
>> enough, to get pass the test by field day so that i may participate
> without
>> supervision in an active field day HF station.
>> Any advice or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>> 73
>> Colin, V A6BKX
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:22 PM
>> Subject: Re: cw versus txt messaging
>>
>>
>> > I go around 25 comfortably and had to work to copy it.  I think it was
> 30
>> wpm.
>> > Really cool!
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.10 - Release Date: 5/13/2005
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2