Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:18:38 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yeah, well the difference is, the BN is pretty much dependent on apps
developed for its proprietary Windows CE system; while the PacMate can use
many off-the-shelf applications through its version of Jaws.
IMHO, there are advantages to both systems. Its all in the beholder, as
they say. I think the BN is still a bit more user friendly; but I know
others will strongly disagree.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: trekker
> Hmmm thanks! The GPS is the lowest of my priorities, but it would be
> nice. I really don't like freedom scientific, but that braille
> display is nice, and it's ability to use and interface with our
> network and desktop applications is important. Maybe a braille note
> qt, but that cord stuff, I think to much in windows, I guess. On the
> other hand, that braille display might help me know about trouble
> that I am crawling in to. It's a big decision, and I don't want to
> make that investment just to find it obsolete in four years.
> Imagine contesting software with braille on a PDA, wouldn't that be sweet?
>
|
|
|