BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:12:26 -0700
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (17 lines)
Not sure what you guys are complaining about.  cw is and always has been
legal everywhere on the bands, phone bands, digital, everywhere.  Now, the
claim has always been it could get through under adverse conditions, and
you can run extremely narrow filtering, why is this a problem.  The
digital modes have been made legal on the cw bands for a long long time,
so I really don't see any great changes.  Also, if you read the present
proposal, I don't see any changes as far as phone band expansion or
anything like that.  I personally have thought digital modes should have
been made legal everywhere just as cw has always been.  Back when I was
experimenting with amtor, it would have made life much simpler.  Just
because the requirement is dropped, doesn't mean the mode is illegal or
that the bands are going away.

73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2