BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:51:23 -0700
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (21 lines)
I don't think the loss of cw is the demise of ham radio.  I still consider
it as much a hobby as it ever was.  It was a hobby for me back in 1968
when I got my general and still is today, although my interests are a
little different.  I never used, no liked cw.  I enjoyed the theory part
much more.  The rule isn't outlawing the use of cw, just the requirement.
If you like cw, that is great, and I'm glad you enjoy it.  I never did,
just wasn't my cup of tea.  I like building repeaters, tuning u duplexers,
computers and anything technical about the hobby.  I have built three i r
l p  nodes, including one I have at my house on my repeater.  I think the
knowledge and skills to accomplish these things is as much a source of
pride and enjoyment for me as the code is for you guys who like the code.
As far as a hobby of just buying and selling radios, how is keeping the cw
requirement going to change any of that.  How many of us have built a
radio in the last 30 years?  I know most won't agree with me, and that
really doesn't bother me much, just take a step back and try and look at
it without all the emotion and throw out the reasoning "well, I had to
learn cw, everyone else should have to learn it too."
73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2