BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:47:40 -0700
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I suppose doing any efficient AM broadcast band receive DX'ing is pretty
hard to do unless you got 300 feet of wire in a straight line to use as an
antenna.
Anybody out here ever use FM broadcast band beams to try and pull those FM
stations a few hundred miles away out of the snow?
Regards
Colin
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: IBOC AM question


> I don't even listen to AM, ever, not the AM broadcast band so I'd never
> notice. The kind of talk radio that's there in this area doesn't interest
me
> what so ever.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 6:04 PM
> Subject: Re: IBOC AM question
>
>
> if we did away with analogue all at once, and I was the manufacturer of
> digital receivers  and transmitting capabilities, ide be very happy
> indeed...especially if i had some pull with the FCC and other regulatory
> federal agencies...or if i had some financial interests in the current
> governmental administration...lol
> but of course, i am not by any means suggesting a conspiracy to force the
> public to do something they dont want to!!
> just random thoughts, no personal opinions here!
> Regards
> Colin
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2