BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: kenwood service - united radio
From:
Christopher Moore <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:54:38 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
Despite the dire warnings offered on this list, eham.net rates kenwood east
at 5.0.  Many of the reviews were written within the past 6 - 9 months.
Perhaps they've hired some more experienced technicians.
Think I'll give them a try and will be sure to post my experiences.

73
Chris de w1gm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2