I would agree with that too.  How do the rest of you best use Win-96 with
JAWS?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Lee" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: correction


> Sorry for the confusion.  I suggested the Pro-95, but I overlooked the
> bulletin on RadioReference that said your system will soon be moving to =
> a
> digital system.  Forget about the 95,  you'll soon need a digital trunk
> tracker and the 96 is the most accessible (my opinion only).
>
> Ken -N5SWR
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of r.mcmanomy
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 8:04 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: correction
>
>
> Well in that case I should go ahead and get a new scanner.
> But I am getting confused.
> I have one email saying Pro 95 and one say 96.
> I know people are going to have different opinions but I just want to =
> make
> sure I get what I need to scan and something that with  or without a =
> little
> learning I can use the scanner.
>
> Just because you can not see the stars does not mean you can not reach =
> for
> them.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 4:46 PM
> Subject: Re: correction
>
>
>> Right, depending on the system you go to some have news of planned
>> upgrades and other news when you first open the data page that contain
>> system frequencies and things like that, and it sounds like they are
>> planni to go digital as th news updated that they had ordered radios =
> which
>> would work on the syste's system there that is digital.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, r.mcmanomy wrote:
>>
>>> Is this Lafayette you are talking about?
>>> Just because you can not see the stars does not mean you can not =
> reach
>>> for
>>> them.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 4:39 PM
>>> Subject: correction
>>>
>>>
>>> > Hi everyone, I just checked radioreference.com, about that system =
> in
>>> > Indiana, and they are analogue at present, but from the system news =
> on
>>> > there it looks like they ahve future plans to go digital.
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
> --=20
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.8/22 - Release Date: 6/17/2005
> =20
>
> --=20
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.8/22 - Release Date: 6/17/2005
> =20