Hi Pat;

One of the most sensitive receivers I ever owned was the 2410H.

What a radio.

73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389


----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: icom ic-38


> Hi Butch,
> I used an ic28 for a short period of time and liked it.  However, it is my
> understanding that there is no provision for speech for any of that trio
> of
> transceivers.  Too bad; the 28 has a really sensitive selective receiver.
> I have had their predecessors for years; 27, 37 and 47.  They all have
> speech but are getting old.  Like their owner, they forget what they have
> in memory but I probably won't go to the extent of replacing the internal
> batteries.
> Hope this helps.
> Pat, K9JAUAt 03:20 PM 4/3/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>>I am considering getting an ic 38 which is a 220 radio.  I've been told it
>>is same as ic-28 for two meters and ic-48 for 450.  Anyone have any
>>experience with either model?   Do they have an optional voice
>>synthesizer, and if so, which board?
>>73s
>>Butch Bussen
>>wa0vjr
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005
>
>