BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:21:26 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Hi John;

I would go with the YB400 because, it is more user friendly.

It does suffer a little from receiver overload however, those Sangean
receivers are not user friendly when it comes to storing frequencies in a
memory location.

For my money, I'll take the SONY 7600GR.

73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389


----- Original Message -----
From: "john riehl" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 5:44 PM
Subject: advice on HF receivers


> I'm looking for sage advice from the list. First, I'm interested in buying
> a portable HF receiver for taking on trips abroad. I want a
> receiver that has a BFO and covers the entire HF spectrum. I'd prefer the
> receiver to have a tuning dial as well as digital entry -- like
> the sony 2010. (Unfortunately, Sony doesn't make the 2010 anymore!)
> Anybody got a recommendation?
>
> also, what desktop HF receivers are available with talking frequency
> readouts? It's been years since I was in the receiver market and
> am not sure what's available now.
> Thanks for the advice!
>  73
>  John  NV3-C
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.3 - Release Date: 4/5/2005
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2