That's the situation also on 900 MHz, but we also have 902-928 MHz which
is our 33CM band.  This is where teh baby monitors and cordles phones for
900 MHz are, and I have never heard any hams on this band.  At the
hospital I am at the nurses on the floors are using cordless phones, but
the type and band I couldn't tell you about.





On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, John Miller wrote:

> ya, we have space pretty close, I forgot about the baby monitors.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 5:02 PM
> Subject: Re: OT cordless phone range question
>
>
> Thanks John, that was going to be my next question about interference, and
> I don't use my home phone that much, and don't know if I move if I'll even
> bother with getting a home phone, but will have to see.    There are other
> thigns following up to 2.4 GHZ like baby monitors and other thigns, and I
> think that we even have space up there don't we?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, John Miller wrote:
>
> > I would say, the higher in frequency you go, the less likely you are to be
> > interfered with, now if you have a wireless computer network,  a 802.11B
> > or
> > G connection,  a 2.4 GHz phone might be limited a little, though I had no
> > problem with this combination but know people who did have problems. How
> > ever, I had an 802.11A set up for a couple months and my 900 MHz phone
> > which
> > works in the same range at that,  they just did not get along at all,  not
> > 1
> > little bit. Basically, if you have a wireless computer network, I'd avoid
> > the frequencies that's on with a cordless phone to be careful, beyond
> > that,
> > I like my 5.8 GHz phone I have now as cordless phones go but am also
> > trying
> > to talk everyone else in the house to ditching the house phone and going
> > all
> > cell phone so I don't have to get their calls all the time. I do seem to
> > get
> > better range with this phone than I did with the 900 MHz phone for some
> > reason, quite noticeably in fact but beyond that, they all seemed the
> > same.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 4:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: OT cordless phone range question
> >
> >
> > Hi, I know the bands, but I just now am wondering about coverage.  I do
> > not
> > have terrain issues to worry about
> >
>