Because, as I believe is one of the primary rules of debate, you don't tout
your own sucesses but attempt to point out the weaknesses in your opponent's
arguements.

Kat

On Monday 04 October 2004 09:35 pm, ken barber wrote:
> okay guys, i have traced down all the leads and i come
> to the conclusion that cameron had a sense of humor
> that got out of hand.this guy appears to have been
> with kerry (assigned to report on his campaign) for
> more than a year. if i had to do that, i'd just had to
> go out and hang myself. this is hardly news.
>
> now more seriously, looking at the debate, which any
> objective onlooker has to give the nod to kerry), i
> found it a little strange, that the prison scandle did
> not come up, nor did kerry's 20 year record in the
> senate, nor did the cia's africa investigation on
> buying the rods, nor the 911 commissions report. 90
> minutes and none of these were even mentioned. just my
> obsevation.
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo