ECHURCH-USA Archives

The Electronic Church

ECHURCH-USA@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vicki and The Rors <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Echurch-USA The Electronic Church <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 18:29:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (123 lines)
Kathy,

Yes, church history is pretty grim during some eras.  And, true enough about
the church gaining wealth while peritioners grew poorer and poorer.  Even
then, there were still those who had a deeply personal yet living
relationship with the Lord.  But here's the difference in today's world that
I see.  Our churches are often fostering spectators rather than participants
by the entertainment that happens.  And if you're not teens, twenties, or
thirties, or thin, or good looking, or extremely talented, or showy... Or
maybe it's what you are that isn't accepted.  And the list goes on and on.
My point being that members of Christ's body are rejected because they don't
fit in to a particular mold.  Many people are quite content to sit back and
listen to a good sermon or hear good music..  They've done their Sunday
thing and they can go back to the world in which they live unchanged and
lacking the ability, Christ in them, to change their world.  I've an idea
these things aren't the original design.  But so often, this is what we see
happening.



Vicki





----- Original Message -----
From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [ECHURCH-USA] Church On The Move


> Actually Vicki,
> even the spectatorship thing is pretty old.  Do you realize that if you
had
> lived in the middle ages that you would have never been allowed to take
> communion?  You would have sat in the congregation and observed while the
> priests enjoyed communion, intinction style, behind a scrim.  Since you
> probably couldn't read, the only understanding of the word that you would
> have had was from the morality plays that the church organized.  You
> wouldn't have been allowed to sing, because you wouldn't have been
> considered worthy and, besides, you probably wouldn't have known
> latin.  You would have watched the church grow wealthier and wealthier,
> accumulating property, art work and literature while you would
> have  been  lucky to scratch out a living with your one ox and fourteen
> children.  If you killed a deer for food from the king's forest, you would
> have been found guilty of stealing and  you wouldn't expect the church to
> come to your defense because the holy people would have been too
> pre-occupied bellying up to his royal highness for certain favors.  I
could
> go on, but I think that you get my point.  The most blessed and most
cursed
> event in church history was to have   Emperor Constantine adopt
> Christianity as the official religion of the Roman empire.  She had
> problems before that, but at that point, she jumped in bed with the devil
> herself and has been doing a lousy job of extracting herself ever
> since.    Neveerthe less, she is still Christ's chosen bride.
> Kathy
>
>
> At 09:23 PM 2/28/2005, you wrote:
> >Kathy,
> >
> >I agree that much of the behavior has existed from perhaps not long after
> >the church was born.  However, this spectatorship, I can't help thinking
> >that it came in as various para-church organizations started picking up
the
> >job of the church.  I'm not saying they are bad.  But maybe there would
be
> >less need for them if the church was being the church, or called out ones
in
> >function.    And thank God for the church.  Unless I miss my guess, and I
> >could very well do that, I believe we'll see it rise up and function as
it
> >was meant to function one day.
> >
> >Promise not to smack me too hard Kathy.  Smile.
> >
> >Vicki
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:20 PM
> >Subject: Re: [ECHURCH-USA] Church On The Move
> >
> >
> > > Well Vicki,
> > > Truthfully, to answer your question about when the church stopped
being
> > > loving and accepting of others in their imperfections, I think that
it's
> > > pretty obvious from the history recorded in the bible that it began
pretty
> > > much at the beginning.  That's why so much is written to correct such
> > > sinful behavior by James and Paul and Peter.  Satan has been working
from
> > > within since the get go.  After all, if he can destroy the church, his
> > > problems will be solved, so he thinks!
> > > Kathy
> > >
> > >
> > > At 10:41 AM 2/27/2005, you wrote:
> > > >Kathy,
> > > >
> > > >In so many places the church has turned to people showing up on
Sunday
> >and
> > > >doing their thing as spectators.  I'd like to know when we quit
accepting
> > > >each other as brothers and sisters in the family of God with our
> >limitations
> > > >and imperfections as well as our God-given gifts.  I'm not
specifically
> > > >saying that of your church.  Just that this kind of trend has done no
> >favors
> > > >to the looks of Christ's bride.
> > > >
> > > >Vicki
> > > >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2