Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 29 May 2005 01:32:45 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would always seek a second apion. It can't hurt. Even if the out come is the same. I would still go for the cateract surgery if there is no danger to loosing what sight he has. 10% is an improvement. And to a visually impaired person 10% could mean a lot more sight.
--
Christ is either Lord of all or he is not Lord at all.
Karen Carter '74
> The eye doctor Ben saw was very negative, he siad he could do lazor on the
> left eye, but personally he did not think this would help, he could remove
> the cataracts, but this would probably only improve his sight by 10% so he
> said he would whatever Ben wanted!!! we are going to find a doctor closer,
> and see if it is as bleak as he says! 10% is something anyway, so I would
> be inclined to have the cataracts removed! we just need someone to explain
> if the damage done is irreversable or not, this man Ben said was totally
> negative, while I believe in telling the truth, surely there should always
> be some h ope!
> Ben seems to be taking it well, but we worry what will happen, will his s
> ight bet wore, will it stay as it is!
> Rhonda
|
|
|