well i think i read an article a few months ago that
reached a directly opposite conclusion. it was that
the sun was going to burn us all. one remarkable
likeness though was how alrming the study publihers
founds the results to be. when one is an ostrich one
does not stay in a state of alarm. i'll probably live
longer than all of you people that are streesed out
and alarmed by all of this. okay forgive the attenpt
at humor, but, i read too many conflicting reports all
stating that global warming is the couse of directly
opposite findings.

--- Deri James <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Wednesday 07 Sep 2005 00:32, ken barber wrote:
> > by the way, i will look at your links, but, i have
> saw
> > just as many that go my way. but, you would not
> want
> > to trust an american and a redneck at that.
>
> Let me know what you think after you've read them.
>
> I'm obviously not as well informed as you, because
> I'm finding it increasingly
> hard to find any serious academic papers which do
> not attribute current
> global warming (in part) to man's activities. How
> much of an effect those
> activities have is always arguable. Six years ago
> there was much more room
> for people to be sceptical, recent evidence has all
> pointed one way.
>
> Interestingly the actual amount of sunlight reaching
> the earth over the last
> 50 years (coinciding with your increased solar
> activity) has actually
> substantially fallen, due to Global Dimming (see
>
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/dimming_prog_summary.shtml>)
> (sorry, this page is a bit "over the top" on
> conclusions but the basic
> premise is sound).
>
> Cheers
>
> Deri
>





______________________________________________________
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/