BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 May 2005 20:16:54 -0700
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (17 lines)
I don't see what the complaints are against the 2000.  I compared both of
them, that is the 2000, Icom 746 pro and even played with a 756 pro 2,
although that was way out of my price class.  I really didn't see that
much difference.  I thought the d s p was a tiny bit better on the 746, but
not that much.  If I'd thought it was that much better, that is what I
would have picked.  I think Kenwood deserves high marks for making their
radios accessible.  I've owned a lot of radios since I got my general back
in 1968, and pretty much prefer Kenwood.  I think they've all kind of gone
down hill on uhf and vhf radios, but that is another subject.  Even many
commercial radios now use the quadrature detecter instead of a real
discriminator, but as I said, that is something else...

I love my 2000.
73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2