Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Re: New study by Cordain, Eaton, Brand-Miller etc.
William <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:06:46 -0500
text/plain (27 lines)
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:23:09 -0500, Keith Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


>
> It will be easy to criticize aspects of the article from the level of
> personal anecdote or armchair
> speculation, but Loren has set the bar high by relying thoughout on
> peer-reviewed literature, so
> let's confine our criticisms to those we can substantiate with
> peer-reviewed references ourselves.
>
> Keith



So our experience is worthless? Or not fit to discuss?

Should Keith be accused of epistomology?

William the Skeptic




--
Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV