oh, i love it lynda. i really do. i love badgering all
you guys too. you all know that if you were for the
war, i could argue against it. i used to do that in
college. college was better for me than high school.
oh, to be back in college and know what i know now.
that might be dangerous for sure.
--- Linda Walker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> ain't free speech great?
>
> At 07:19 PM 3/25/2006, you wrote:
> > well, i do know there are calls for the iraqis
> to
> >pay us back some of the rebuilding money that is
> being
> >spent, but, bush has faught making this a loan type
> >arrangemt. he gets lots of critisism from the right
> >for this.
> > i will say this, and it wont be popular with
> >anybody. i hope like hell we are building a base to
> >attack iran if it is necessary. the eu and un is
> >having no effect on them in trying to get them not
> to
> >make an nuclear bomb. i'll make myself even less
> >popular by saying that the problems with iran goes
> >back to the bungling of the carter administration.
> >jimmy was a good person, but he should have stayed
> >home growing peanuts and sent his brother billy to
> >washington dc. i know how some of you guys love
> him.
> >
> > okay, if you are still reading... i now have one
> >email saying we can't get the oil we went for
> becouse
> >the wells and pipelines are being blown up. that
> would
> >indicate that our military is not guarding them to
> >well, on the other hand we have another email
> saying
> >some observers (unnamed) say we ARE guarding the
> wells
> >and pipelines so we can get the oil in the future.
> i
> >guess we are waiting for the price of oil to go up
> >further so when we do "steal" it we can say it is
> >worth more. on that bush and chenny,! they are sly
> >oilment to hold it for the price to go up. and they
> >are such bunglers in every other way. i guess every
> >one is good at something after all.
> > pardon me if i step away from my computer to
> >chuckle. :-)
> >
> >
> >--- Linda Walker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > > Actually according to some observers the oil
> wells
> > > are being
> > > protected. We expect Iraq to pay for our
> military
> > > assault or as some
> > > think our effort to democratize them with their
> oil.
> > > We are building
> > > bases there to invade Iran next.
> > > As a people we cannot afford to continue to do
> this
> > > to other countries.
> > >
> > > At 12:06 PM 3/25/2006, you wrote:
> > > >We're not getting oil from Iraq because the oil
> > > wells keep getting
> > > >set on fire,
> > > >and it's become too expensive to transport.
> Things
> > > are so unstable
> > > >over there
> > > >I find it difficult to believe how anyone other
> > > than a private
> > > >security firm
> > > >can make any profits.
> > > >
> > > >Kat
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On 25 Mar 2006, at 14:52, ken barber wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > i was looking at this and i am sorry that it
> > > came off
> > > > > so harshly, that was not my intention. my
> point
> > > is
> > > > > that nobody lied about wmd. lots of people
> were
> > > > > mistaken maybe, but, nobody lied.
> > > > > this is an emotional statement judt like
> > > saying
> > > > > "haliburtin" or "war for oil." it may
> produce a
> > > > > emotional release, but, is basically devoid
> of
> > > facts.
> > > > > when i hear "war for oil", i'd like to
> know
> > > how much
> > > > > oil we get from iraq. fact is that we get
> very
> > > little
> > > > > so if it is a "war for oil" why are we not
> > > getting it?
> > > > >
> > > > > i appolgise again openly to mag, for being
> so
> > > harsh
> > > > > in this post. mag, you know i love you.
> > > > > now, i got to get back to my saturday
> chores.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- ken barber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> now mag, the definition of a lie is to tell
> > > > >> something
> > > > >> that you know is not true at the time you
> tell
> > > it.
> > > > >> look it up.
> > > > >> you guys who can't come up with anything
> but
> > > "bush
> > > > >> lied" just do not know how foolish you
> sound. i
> > > love
> > > > >> you, but, please, get past that tripe. bush
> as
> > > well
> > > > >> as
> > > > >> all your derm senators and intelligence
> around
> > > the
> > > > >> world all said saddam had wmd. you do not
> say
> > > every
> > > > >> body lied, only "bush lied."
> > > > >> the truth is that nobody lied about wmd,
> > > becouse
> > > > >> not
> > > > >> a one of them knew that he did not have
> them
> > > and
> > > > >> went
> > > > >> ahead and said he did.
> > > > >> get past the foolishness and get
> something
> > > > >> substantial to say.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --- Magenta Raine <[log in to unmask]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Saddam is being tried for the atrocities
> he
> > > > >>> perpetrated against the Kurds,
> > > > >>> and Iranians, as well as murdering some of
> his
> > > own
> > > > >>> people.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Bush lying about weapons of mass
> destruction
> > > or
> > > > >>> Clinton lying about his
> > > > >>> affair; which is worse? I say bush's
> lies
> > > about
> > > > >>> wmd is worse because
> > > > >>> after they found no wmd, he made up
> several
> > > other
> > > > >>> stories about why we are
> > > > >>> there.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > >>> [log in to unmask]
> > > > >>> Come visit my new store!
> > > > >>> http://www.cafepress.com/TamarMag
> > > > >>> visit my Blog at;
> > > > >>> http://tamarmag-newsletters.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> [Original Message]
> > > > >>>> From: Anthony Arnold
> > > <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > >>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > >>>> Date: 3/24/2006 5:19:03 PM
> > > > >>>> Subject: Re: FW: was dental question
> now
> > > iraq
> > > > >>> war.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I don't know what we're currently trying
> > > Hussein
> > > > >>> and his brother for, but
> > > > >>>> they had no involvement in September
> 11th, so
> > > > >> why
> > > > >>> are we over there
> > > > >>> besides
> > > > >>>> to take our frustration out on somebody.
> But
> > > on
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
